Quaternary dichotomous voting rules

نویسندگان
چکیده

برای دانلود باید عضویت طلایی داشته باشید

برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Quaternary dichotomous voting rules

In this paper we provide a general model of ‘quaternary’dichotomous voting rules (QVRs), namely, voting rules for making collective dichotomous decisions (to accept or reject a proposal), based on vote pro…les in which four options are available to each voter: voting (‘yes’, ‘no’or ‘abstaining’) or staying home and not turning out. The model covers most of actual real-world dichotomus rules, wh...

متن کامل

Consensus versus Dichotomous Voting

Consensus means general agreement among possibly di erent views, while dichotomus voting rules are a means of making decisions by using votes to settle di erences of view. How then can it often be the case that a committee whose only formal mechanism for decision-making is a dichotomus voting rule reaches a consensus? In this paper, based on a game-theoretic model developed in three previous pa...

متن کامل

Approval Voting on Dichotomous Preferences

The aim of this paper is to find normative foundations of Approval Voting.In order to show that Approval Voting is the only social choice functionthat satisfies anonymity, neutrality, strategy-proofness and strict mono-tonicity we rely on an intermediate result which relates strategy-proofnessof a social choice function to the properties of Independence of IrrelevantAlte...

متن کامل

Lot-based voting rules

The Internet Engineering Task Force develops and promotes Internet standards like TCP/IP. The chair of the Task Force is chosen by an election which starts with a set of voters being selected at random from the electorate of volunteers. Selecting decision makers by lottery like this has a long and venerable history, having been used in Athenian democracy over two millennia ago, as well as for o...

متن کامل

Dynamically consistent voting rules

Many preference aggregation problems are not, by nature, one-shot. In these settings, voter preferences need to be repeatedly aggregated as a function of the underlying pool of options that are being voted over. For example, imagine that a firm votes an offer to a candidate. If the offer is declined, then the pool of options shrinks, votes are aggregated once more, and a subsequent offer is mad...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Social Choice and Welfare

سال: 2011

ISSN: 0176-1714,1432-217X

DOI: 10.1007/s00355-011-0538-1